Insights, guides, and best practices for AI automation in business operations.
Explore our collection of guides, insights, and best practices
A comprehensive taxonomy synthesizing 150+ research papers reveals how machine learning transforms traditional RPA into intelligent automation systems. The framework identifies eight dimensions—from architecture to data integration—that determine whether RPA-ML combinations deliver genuine intelligence or merely incremental improvements.
Interviews with 22 business process management practitioners reveal a dual landscape: AI agents promise efficiency and predictive insights, but introduce risks around bias, over-reliance, and transparency. This research provides a governance framework for integrating autonomous agents into structured business processes without losing control.
New research reveals that AI automation of entry-level tasks could reduce long-term U.S. economic growth by up to 0.35 percentage points by disrupting how junior employees learn from experienced professionals—not through job losses, but by severing critical apprenticeship pathways.
A landmark study of 5,172 customer support agents reveals how generative AI creates 'skill compression'—enabling novices to perform at near-veteran levels and fundamentally disrupting traditional talent economics.
The most-cited AI labor market research reveals that 80% of U.S. workers could see 10%+ of their tasks affected by LLMs—but counterintuitively, higher-income professionals face greater exposure than lower-wage workers.
Researchers tested whether large language models could accurately predict labor market changes caused by AI itself, creating a benchmark that fuses World Economic Forum data with Indeed job postings. The findings reveal systematic performance variation across sectors—accurate for some industries, unreliable for others—raising questions about when to trust AI-generated forecasts.
An enterprise study tracking 300 engineers over 12 months found that AI coding tools reduced pull request cycle time by 31.8% and increased code volume by 61%—but only for developers who actively adopted the tools.
Research extending the Eloundou framework to China's labor market finds that occupations with higher LLM exposure show positive correlations with wage and experience premiums—suggesting that AI impact may diverge from the traditional routinization hypothesis where middle-skill jobs face displacement.
A structural model analyzing Freelancer.com data reveals that LLMs have disrupted labor market signaling—employers pay less for customized job applications because they can no longer distinguish high-effort signals from AI-generated ones.
Using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach across occupations, researchers found that workers in jobs highly exposed to ChatGPT saw earnings increases rather than displacement—suggesting that in the short term, AI adoption operates through wage premiums for AI-augmented productivity, not unemployment.
Population-level analysis across 687,000+ consumer complaints, 537,000+ press releases, 304 million job postings, and 15,900+ UN releases reveals that 18-24% of professional writing now shows LLM assistance—with penetration plateauing, suggesting either market saturation or AI becoming so subtle it's undetectable.
A year-long study of 107 knowledge workers reveals LLM usage shifted from isolated tasks to workflow integration and organizational data connectivity—creating new opportunities and risks that require adaptive governance.
Researchers studied 844 tasks across 104 occupations to compare what workers want AI to do versus what AI can actually do—revealing critical mismatches that companies must address before deployment.
Study of 20 knowledge workers identifies three essential features for AI tools: adaptable user control, transparent collaboration, and organizational context integration—without them, adoption fails.
Survey of 66 national lab employees reveals emerging 'copilot' usage patterns alongside concerns about data safety, publication ethics, and job security—exposing critical policy gaps.
Six-month experiment with 7,137 workers shows AI saved 3.6 hours/week on email but didn't reduce meeting time—revealing uneven productivity benefits across different work types.
McKinsey's State of AI report reveals 65% of organizations now use generative AI regularly—double the previous year's rate. But 74% still struggle to scale. Learn what separates AI leaders from laggards.
Controlled experiments reveal when traditional RPA outperforms AI agents and where hybrid architectures deliver the best of both worlds for enterprise automation.
A rigorous randomized controlled trial found that AI coding assistants increased task completion time by 19% for experienced developers—challenging assumptions about universal productivity gains.
Stop drowning in repetitive tasks. Let AI handle the boring stuff while you focus on what matters.
Start 14-Day Free TrialGet started instantly • Set up in minutes • Cancel anytime